Showing posts with label Social Security modernization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Security modernization. Show all posts

Friday, December 27, 2013

Banker/Wall Street Year-End Bonuses & The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan

Banker/Wall Street Year-End Bonuses & The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan

Some writers and groups have been speculating on what Bank & Wall Street Executives could or should do with their extravagant year-end bonuses. www.other98.com/end-the-banker-bonuses-this-holiday-season .

As part of its December 27, 2013 show, Democracy Now has a thoughtful discussion on this topic. One aspect of the DN discussion talked about the importance of closing “loopholes.” I agree. http://www.democracynow.org/2013/12/27/occupy_offshoot_urges_wall_street_to


Supporters of The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan view this a little differently. Once it is adopted, and short-term capital gains and rents are subject to paying the Social Security payroll tax and, accordingly, these earning are taxed by IRS rules as wage or ordinary income subject to those higher income tax rates, Wall Street year-end bonuses might become a little smaller and more frugally constructed. There might be even less dancing on the Wall Street executive boardroom tables!

The added revenues from the enactment into law of The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan will significantly contribute to a stronger, more solvent Social Security program and might even act to lower the nation’s debt and could even enable the availability of funds to repair the nation’s infrastructure which could even lower the currently unacceptable unemployment rate.  Dominoes - anyone?












Monday, December 16, 2013

Which Type Of C.O.L.A.* Is B.E.S.T.**?

Which Type Of C.O.L.A.*  Is B.E.S.T.**?

Beginning with June 1975, Social Security benefits increased automatically with increases in the cost of living. In 1983, the Social Security benefit cost-of-living-increase became effective in December (payable in January of the next year) rather than June. Here is a history of the dates and amounts of increases over the years:  http://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0300601120. The December 2013 COLA amount is 1.5%.

The COLA is an across the board percentage increase for all Social Security beneficiaries. (It is a little more complicated than this due to rounding and other deductions, but, in general, that is how it works.)

Thus, for someone who gets a $2,000 a month Social Security check that person will receive a $30 or 1.5% increase. While the December 2013 COLA is relatively small, a person who is currently getting a $2000 check might be able to buy a small bag of groceries with their COLA increase.

However, for someone who receives a smaller Social Security check, for example, of $450 per month, the 1.5% COLA that they will receive will be only $6 or $7. If the Medicare premium being deducted from their Social Security goes up significantly, they may see even less of an increase or perhaps nothing at all.

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts is proposing improving Social Security by providing larger COLAs based on a more realistic formula of using increases in the cost of living relevant for retirees. This is a good idea which should be pursued.

In the meantime, is their a better way to pay out that 1.5% increase in Social Security payouts for December starting in January 2014? Why not pay out a flat or “de-fizzed” COLA to all recipients?

Here is a chart that as of November 2013 the total number of Social Security beneficiaries and the total amount of benefits they are being paid each month: www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfacts/stat_snapshot . Roughly, in 2013, Social Security pays out $67.4 billion each month to 57.9 million beneficiaries.

A 1.5% COLA paid out on this amount, then, would amount to $1 billion. If each beneficiary were to receive the same amount of a COLA or a flat COLA, each beneficiary would receive $17 more each month. That’s not much, but it is much better than $6. (This issue is a little more complex than this, as some beneficiaries receive benefits as part of a family and it does make sense to limit the flat increases to family members to 50% of the wage earner’s increase – a relatively simple algebra problem.)

It is likely that legislation would be required for Social Security to be able to pay out the “de-fizzed” flat COLA. That’s why I would like a seat at the table when Social Security reform is legislated. However, keep in mind that not all changes to Social Security procedures require a change in the law.

Let’s pay Social Security COLAs in a more equitable, progressive fashion!



* Cost-Of-Living-Adjustment      **Balanced-Equitable-Solvent-Tested