Showing posts with label rents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rents. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Another Archival Summary of the BEST Social Security Mod Plan

Another Archival Summary of the BEST Social Security Mod Plan

For more details on the plan, please read my earlier posts!

Historical Background

Since Social Security’s inception in 1935, many changes have been made to the program. Some examples are adding disability benefits, the Supplemental Security Income program, Medicare, and mandating coverage for the self-employed and employees of non-profit organizations.

What It Does

·          Improves long range solvency of the Social Security Trust Funds.

·          Adds progressivity to Social Security taxation.

·          Welcomes new groups of workers into the Social Security program.

·          Serves to stabilize the economy.

·          Slows the inflation of real estate values.

·          Inspires new confidence in the Social Security program.

What It Does Not Do

·          It does not remove the Social Security wage/coverage cap.

·          It does not increase the retirement age.

·          It does not reduce the amount of retirement benefits.

How Does It Do It?

·          Lowers the payroll tax rate for workers/self-employed who earn at or below minimum wage levels from 7.65%-15.3% respectively to 4.65%-9.3%.

·          Increases the payroll tax for that portion of earnings which exceed the curent maximum covered base from 7.65%-15.3% to 9.65%-17.3%, using current methodology for cap increases, over a 10 year rolling period.

·          Adds three new categories of work which will be subject to Social Security coverage: Short term capital gains, all rentals from real estate, and working for state & local employers currently not covered by Social Security for the first five years of employment.

Who Does It Affect?

·          Having an equitable, progressive, solvent Social Security program affects everyone.

·          Those who work in real estate rentals and in the businesses of short term investing, and currently non-covered state and local employers and employees.

·          Higher wage earners who earn in excess of the current Social Security maximum.

·          Minimum wage earners, young workers starting to work, and retired part-time workers.

·          Start-up businesses whose profits are at minimum wage levels.


Friday, December 27, 2013

Banker/Wall Street Year-End Bonuses & The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan

Banker/Wall Street Year-End Bonuses & The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan

Some writers and groups have been speculating on what Bank & Wall Street Executives could or should do with their extravagant year-end bonuses. www.other98.com/end-the-banker-bonuses-this-holiday-season .

As part of its December 27, 2013 show, Democracy Now has a thoughtful discussion on this topic. One aspect of the DN discussion talked about the importance of closing “loopholes.” I agree. http://www.democracynow.org/2013/12/27/occupy_offshoot_urges_wall_street_to


Supporters of The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan view this a little differently. Once it is adopted, and short-term capital gains and rents are subject to paying the Social Security payroll tax and, accordingly, these earning are taxed by IRS rules as wage or ordinary income subject to those higher income tax rates, Wall Street year-end bonuses might become a little smaller and more frugally constructed. There might be even less dancing on the Wall Street executive boardroom tables!

The added revenues from the enactment into law of The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan will significantly contribute to a stronger, more solvent Social Security program and might even act to lower the nation’s debt and could even enable the availability of funds to repair the nation’s infrastructure which could even lower the currently unacceptable unemployment rate.  Dominoes - anyone?












Thursday, December 12, 2013

Table Of Contents - November 25, 2013 - December 11, 2013

Table Of Contents – November 25, 2013 – December 11, 2013

Since I began the BEST Social Security Modernization Plan blog on November 25th, I have covered a lot of complex information. I thought that providing an easily accessible Table of Contents and providing a brief summary of the Mod Plan’s goals might be helpful to readers. Please, ask any questions you have about the plan via the “comments” sections.

The Summary: The Balanced, Equitable, Solvent, Tested (B.E.S.T.) Social Security Mod (Modernization) Plan is opposed to any reductions in Social Security benefits. It is also opposed to any increases in the Social Security retirement age. Its goals are to improve the solvency of the Social Security trust fund by infusing new sources of revenue, to make the Social Security payroll tax more progressive, and to recommend other improvements, expansions, and innovations to the Social Security program.

The Table Of Contents:

Medicare For All - Are We There, Yet? - 12/11/13

Cut Social Security? H*ll No!!! - Increase It & Make It Better!!! Part 1 - 12/10/13

A Progressive Payroll Tax 2 - Mid & Upper Wage - 12/9/13

A Progressive Payroll Tax 1 - Low Wage - 12/8/13

New Sources Of Revenue 3 - Capital Gains And Dividends - 12/6/13

New Sources Of Revenue 2 - Rentals From Real Estate - 12/5/13

"I'm Also Unemployed" - How The Way We Work Has Changed - 12/4/13

From The Archives 3 - The BEST Mod Plan Factsheet - 12/3/13

New Sources Of Revenue 1 - New State & Local Employees - 12/2/13

Data, Statistics, Number Crunching & Exactitude - 12/1/13

Scrapping The Cap Is A Crappy Idea - 11/30/13

From The Archives 2 - The YouTube Videos - 11/29/13

From The Archives 1 - A Published Op Ed Piece - 11/28/13

A Seat At The Table - 11/27/13

Social Security History & Benefit Info - 11/26/13


A Few BEST Social Security Modernization Plan Basics - An Introduction – 11/25/13 

Thursday, December 5, 2013

New Sources Of Revenue 2 - Rentals From Real Estate

New Sources Of Revenue 2 - Rentals From Real Estate

A second source of new revenue that the BEST Social Security Modernization Plan proposes to infuse additional funding into the Social Security trust fund is rental income from real estate.

Under current law rental income is taxable if one of three conditions is met: https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0301803600 . The second of these three conditions is when “personal services” are provided as part of the rental agreement. These are defined here: https://secure.ssa.gov/apps10/poms.nsf/lnx/0301803624 .

I feel that those who rent real estate are working by way of their financial investment, their diligence, and their vigilance, in not only protecting their investment, but also in their quest to earn money via their investment. The current exception is admittedly rather arbitrary and all rentals should be subject to paying the SECA tax.

In fact, working and earning money via investments and rentals of real estate has become a very trendy way of working and earning a living, perhaps precisely because of the current Social Security tax exemption loophole.


Now once the law is changed to remove the exception to Social Security coverage rentals from real estate is it a fairly straightforward process to collect the tax from the self-employed: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc554.html . However, if even the same individual is incorporated how do we collect the “compulsory” Social Security tax? In fact, has Social Security been collecting the compulsory tax from those landlords who have been performing personal services if those landlords are incorporated? I do not think so. While a corporation may require an employee to be paid a salary, the additional net income from real estate rentals should also be subject to the FICA/SECA tax.

This is why I want a seat at the table when Social Security is reformed. I propose that net earnings from rentals from real estate be subject to the 12.4 per cent Social Security tax. This tax should be compulsory and the monies should be credited to the Social Security trust fund. The 12.4% could be a deduction from corporate earning subject to income taxes, but it should not reduce the net earnings from real estate. If the landlords pass on the SECA tax to renters, then the added pass along amount will increase the net rental income thereby causing a further increase to the amount of Social Security taxes payable.

This newly proposed Social Security tax differs from currently existing taxes as the money paid into the Social Security trust fund will not be credited to any individual, but it will boost Social Security trust fund solvency. Keep in mind that Social Security is a social insurance program where shared contributions proved retirement, survivor, and disability insurance to all participants. It is not that unlike the situation of am unmarried worker, without children or dependent parents, who works and pays into the trust fund right up to her/his untimely death before age 62. No benefits ever are paid to anyone on this worker’s account. Yet, her/his contributions served to keep the program solvent.

However, if we can all agree that earning from real estate should be subject to Social Security taxation, then we should be able to collect that tax regardless of whether these earnings are from the self-employed or a corporate structure.

In addition to being a new source of revenue for the Social Security trust fund, there is another reason why making rental income and stock market gains and capital gains subject to Social Security taxation will make the trust fund solvent: persons or corporations generally receive these types of income for longer periods of time than the typical worker. Monthly Social Security retirement benefits are calculated by using the worker’s highest 35 years of earnings after they are indexed for inflation. A typical worker might have 40 years where they pay into the Social Security trust funds. Thus Social Security collects Social Security taxes for an extra 5 years which do not affect the worker’s benefits at all. This benefits the trust fund. The worker who has rental income, stock market gains, or capital gains may have, for example, 55 years of creditable earnings. Yet, only 35 years affect the worker’s benefits. In this case rather than having an extra 5 years to boost the trust funds, there will be 20 years of additional tax receipts to keep Social Security solvent.

Update: Some may wonder, what about the old venerable owner-occupied duplex? I’m not in favor of modernizing Social Security by adding exceptions to coverage. However, a realistic compromise might be to exclude owner-occupied rental income for duplexes only, beginning with the year in which the owner reaches full retirement age, which is currently age 66 but is scheduled to top out at age 67 in the future.







Wednesday, December 4, 2013

"I'm Also Unemployed" - How The Way We Work Has Changed



“I’m Also Unemployed” – How The Way We Work Has Changed

During, the 2012 US election, Republican presidential candidate, Willard M. Romney, quipped, “I’m Also Unemployed.”  http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/romney-im-also-unemployed/ Some interpreted this as a joke, an attempt at humor. I did not. What Mr. Romney was saying is that under the current Social Security law definition of work, despite his vast earnings, he was not “working.” This is why The BEST Social Security Modernization Plan proposes updating the definition of work to bring it into the 21st century.

The way many of us work has changed. Some of us still perform physical labor like manufacturing, construction, others in desk-type job including teaching, but many now earn their living by capital investment in areas like rentals, the stock market, and other forms of financial speculation. Make no mistake: those who earn money via financial investment are working. They are merely using their capital, or the capital of others, rather than physical or mental skills to do so.

As I noted in my November 26, 2013 post, Social Security has a history of change and progressively rolling out additions and improvements.

Section 211 of Title II of the Social Security Act was written to specifically exclude rentals from real estate, stock market gains, and capital gains from the definition of covered self-employment income at the time around 1950 when self-employment income became covered under the Social Security program. The fact that it had to be specifically excluded indicates that there had been some consideration then of including this type of income as a self-employment income. Here is a reprinted section of the law:

*****
Sec211[42 U.S.C. 411]  For the purposes of this title—

Net Earnings From Self-Employment[163]

(a) The term “net earnings from self-employment” means the gross income, as computed under subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, derived by an individual from any trade or business carried on by such individual, less the deductions allowed under such subtitle which are attributable to such trade or business, plus his distributive share (whether or not distributed) of the ordinary net income or loss, as computed under section 702(a)(8) of such Code, from any trade or business carried on by a partnership of which he is a member; except that in computing such gross income and deductions and such distributive share of partnership ordinary net income or loss—
(1) There shall be excluded rentals from real estate and from personal property leased with the real estate (including such rentals paid in crop shares, and including payments under section 1233(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3833(2)) to individuals receiving benefits under section 202 or 223), together with the deductions attributable thereto, unless such rentals are received in the course of a trade or business as a real estate dealer; except that the preceding provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any income derived by the owner or tenant of land if (A) such income is derived under an arrangement, between the owner or tenant and another individual, which provides that such other individual shall produce agricultural or horticultural commodities (including livestock, bees, poultry, and fur-bearing animals and wildlife) on such land, and that there shall be material participation by the owner or tenant (as determined without regard to any activities of an agent of such owner or tenant) in the production or the management of the production of such agricultural or horticultural commodities, and (B) there is material participation by the owner or tenant (as determined without regard to any activities of an agent of such owner or tenant) with respect to any such agricultural or horticultural commodity;
(2) There shall be excluded dividends on any share of stock, and interest on any bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued with interest benefits or in registered form by any corporation (including one issued by a government or political subdivision thereof), unless such dividends and interest are received in the course of a trade or business as a dealer in stocks or securities;
(3) There shall be excluded any gain or loss (A) which is considered under subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a capital asset, (B) from the cutting of timber, or the disposal of timber, coal, or iron ore, if section 631 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954[164] applies to such gain or loss, or (C) from the sale, exchange, involuntary conversion, or other disposition of property if such property is neither (i) stock in trade or other property of a kind which would properly be includible in inventory if on hand at the close of the taxable year, nor (ii) property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the trade or business;
*****
It is now time to acknowledge that those who earn their livelihood from any of these three sources of income are working and should be subject to paying Social Security taxes, which for the self-employed are sometimes referred to as SECA taxes: Self Employment Contribution Act taxes, which is a comparable term to FICA or Federal Insurance Contributions Act, the comparable term for the tax for employees.

While, requiring the self employed to contribute Social Security taxes to the Social Security Trust Fund for rental income, stock market investment gains and other capital gains is an important component of THE BEST Social Security Modernization Plan, more must be done.

I suspect that there is a lower percentage of self-employed businesses than in the 1950’s and that more businesses have adopted some form of incorporation. From the IRS website, here is a list of types of business structures: http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Business-Structures .

I will be proposing in future posts that these three types of profits which are earned by corporations should also require corporation businesses to make comparable contributions to the Social Security trust fund.







Tuesday, December 3, 2013

From The Archives 3 - The BEST Mod Plan Factsheet

From The Archives 3 - The BEST Mod Plan Factsheet

Today, I am reprinting a Factsheet from November 11, 2010:



The Balanced, Equitable, Solvent, Tested (BEST)
Social Security Modernization (Mod) Plan


Overview

  • The BEST Social Security Mod Plan is superior to other Social Security solvency plans because it does not raise the retirement age, does not reduce benefits, and it does not privatize Social Security.

  • It works by updating the definition of work and earnings and adding new classes of workers to the list of those who pay Social Security payroll/self-employment taxes.

  • It corrects a defect in the law which causes many high earners to pay income taxes at lower rates than low and mid income workers.

  • It adds progressivity to the Social Security payroll tax rate, creating a three tier system, and also corrects a defect in the law which prevents the Social Security wage base from increasing during periods of low inflation and stagnant wages.

  • It does not eliminate the income wage cap, nor does it significantly raise it. While eliminating the income cap would bring more revenue into Social Security coffers, it would also significantly increase the amount of benefits paid out to these high earners, creating an acceleration of cash outflow from the Social Security trust funds.



New Sources of Program Revenue

  • Requires non-covered state and local governments to pay Social Security taxes for new employees during their first five years of employment. This insures that these workers will be covered for Social Security disability benefits during the transitional period when these workers are not yet vested in the state or local retirement plan.

  • Requires rental income from all real estate rentals to be subject to Social Security taxes.

  • Requires short term-capital gains to be taxed as wages or self-employment earnings. These investors are working and should be required to pay taxes at the same rates as other workers.

  • Redefines short term capital gains to be all investments held thirty or fewer months, an increase from the current twelve month rule.

  • These newly defined forms of Social Security Earnings would be subject to both the Social Security payroll/self employment tax and paying income taxes at the current marginal tax rate instead of the lower long term capital gains tax rates.


Making The Program More Progressive

  • Lowers the payroll tax rate for employees/self-employed whose total annual earnings are at or below the federal minimum wage level from 7.65%/15.3% to 4.65%/9.3%.

  • Increases the payroll tax rate for that portion of wages which exceeds the 2010 wage cap from 7.65%/15.3% to 9.65%/17.3%. This higher tax rate will apply to only that portion of earnings which exceed the 2010 wage cap over a rolling ten year period. After ten years, the 2011 portion which exceeded the 2010 level will revert to the original 7.65%15.3% rate. Rather than removing the wage income cap, this will serve to increase revenue without causing benefits to be increased.

  • Corrects a defect in the law which caused the income cap to stagnate for 2010 and 2011, by recommending corrective legislation which increases the wage income cap to increase annually by the higher of either the current methodology or by the average of the ten previous yearly increases from 2000 to 2009 or the last ten years. Using the figures from these ten years, the 2011 wage cap base would increase by $3,420 from $106,800 to $110,220.


What The BEST Social Security Mod Plan Accomplishes

  • One effect of the BEST Social Security Mod Plan is that low earnings, part-time, younger & older workers as well as many small start-up businesses will get a payroll tax break. This will encourage these workers to enter or stay in the workforce and will help to inspire Social Security program confidence.

  • Adding a payroll higher tax rate to only that portion of earnings which exceed the wage base or cap over a rolling ten year period will increase program revenue without triggering higher benefit outlays.

  • The three new types of work and earnings subject to the payroll/self employment tax will provide an additional source of program revenue, and provide a source of additional federal income tax revenues without the consideration of whether or not to extend the Bush tax cuts.

  • Improves the long-term solvency of the Social Security program.


Join the Best Social Security Mod Plan Team!




November 11, 2010

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Data, Statistics, Number Crunching & Exactitude



Data, Statistics, Number Crunching & Exactitude

Before I go further, it is important for all to understand that I do not have access to all the data and statistics that are available to the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In addition, the BEST Social Security Mod Plan is a broad, extensive framework for Social Security reform and for preventing program cuts and for advocating program expansion. Thus, many of my proposals could be changed, tweaked or adjusted as long as my broader goals are preserved.

For example, I do not know the exact affect implementing a more progressive payroll tax will have on the Social Security trust funds. While my proposal to define short term capital gains as wages is not negotiable, the length of time differentiating short term from long term capital gains might be, depending on how they affect the Plan.

However, I do fully support my proposals and my goal is to gain widespread support for the plan as a whole. Once that occurs, I expect that SSA & IRS actuaries will be expected to provide detailed analyses to determine each component’s effectiveness and the effect of any modified or adjusted scenarios.

Future Posts: New Sources of Revenue, A Progressive Payroll Tax, and more …